5 Nov
2013
5 Nov
'13
11:01 p.m.
On 2013-11-05, Wes James comptekki@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then?
If it were harder to disable (either temporarily or permanently) then I could see someone making this case. But it's trivial to disable SELinux in CentOS, so there's no real reason to use a different distro just because it doesn't use SELinux.
--keith
--
kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us