On 12/04/11 00:03, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer anything, they simply rebuild the upstream sources. It's not rocket science.
It's not simple...
Which part isn't simple?
The part where you guess why your build doesn't match the upstream binary.
If it was simple, why would it take 86 days or 6 months ? I would like to have an answer to that. Either it is hard, and more people could help fix issues. Or it is simple and the CentOS developers have been slacking ?
In fairness, I did say it could be time consuming. I don't know what took 86 days.
Anyone from the QA team interested to share some information on what happened during QA ?
The QA team are not permitted to comment on such matters as QA is a closed process.