Max Pyziur wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Max Pyziur pyz@brama.com wrote:
<snip> > To clarify, the machine is a test/development box that also acts as a > router to a DSL connection that (for the most part) replicates a > co-located production machine that is currently running CentOS 5.8. > > Until recently, energies have been dedicated to other endeavors. > Currently, efforts are being made to upgrade all relevant components to > appropriate recent stable releases of OS's. In no way was an FC2 machine > used in a production environment, and no effort was made to create that > impression.
Ok. That *was* the impression you gave.
No it wasn't. That was your mistaken interpretation.
<snip> >>>> Last, CentOS is built from Fedora Core 6. Usually, it makes sense to >>>> proceed sequentially. >> >> So you're going to upgrate to FC3, 4 and 5 before going to CentOS? > > Possibly. Unless someone else can attest to their own experience and > knowledge that it's generally ok to move from FC2 to CentOS 5.*. That > was > my point in starting this thread.
*sigh* I was being sarcastic. Doing all that work would be silly, esp.
You should do a better job of signalling your sarcasm.
with what would be needed to do so. Again, it would be *much* less work to build a good box of 5.8, or maybe 6.2, and load and configure that.
I'm not interested in acquiring more hardware but rather hope to use what I have. It works satisfactorily in its current configuration; my interest is in aligning the OS of the test/backup unit with that of the production machine.
<snip> mark
Max Pyziur pyz@brama.com