On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 06:59 -0600, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
Not necessarily. The large corporations pay the search engines to ensure that they come up higher on the response lists.
I understand that RedHat is trying to protect their income. After all, why pay for RHEL if CentOS is free? I basically have two questions that I need to find a good IP attorney to clarify for me:
You buy RHEL because you want/need support ... simple as that.
- If CentOS is, in fact, a re-compile clone of RHEL with RH's
permission (as per the GPL), then how can they legally require that CentOS not disclose that fact? 2) Is it legal to restrict others from linking to your website?
For #2 it's been my understanding that linking to a website is always allow http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35306,00.html
I think RH's going a bit overboard, as there really was no confusion as to whether or not RH was supporting CentOS.
I agree, I'm becomming a frustrated with them and this issue.
Paul