On Monday 28 January 2019 12:23:25 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel lists@eckel-edv.de:
I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula became, to put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my taste.
Inactive? Every 2 months a release (average):
I am a long time user of Bacula (Fedora 9) but I must admit that I do not keep up with versions. (I'm still running the F9 Bacula 5.2 director).
What real world benefits would I get from upgrading to the current Bacula version? What problems woudl I have? What are the arguments for/against Bareos?
My storage servers range from F9 to C7 and all work fine. I'm still using the old WinBacula clients even with the new Win10 boxes.