Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 04:12 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Daniel wrote: > On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote: >> Daniel wrote: >>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5, and I see: >>>> >>>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate declaration >>>> in >>>> module: >>>> type/attribute zos_remote_t >>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed >>>> semodule: Failed!
<snip>
Remove all audispd-zos-remote.pp and zos_remote.pp
We ship zosremote.pp
Ok... I can do that, but are you saying to just rm it, and not whatever package it came in?
<snip>
I think you will find that it does not happen for everyone else and that these files do not belong to other packages. I have a feeling that something went wrong on an update that left these files around.
Hmmm...but I don't know if rm'ing them will work, if they're in the d/b. So I suppose I'll have to find the package that put them there...
<time passes> Ok, anyone on the CentOS list: does *anyone* know where this came from? It' sin the directory provided by selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-279.el5.noarch, but there's no zos_remote in the package.
Trust me on this, I know what I am talking about.
Just remove them. They were put there by previous versions of audit and maybe selinux-policy. If you are concerned you can squirrel them away.
selinux-policy takes all pp files in the active directory and compiles them into a policy module.
Ok, I believe you. I also found the same .pp in .../previous/, and diff said no difference, so no problem rm'ing them.
mark