8 Jan
2014
8 Jan
'14
2:27 a.m.
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 20:14 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
If the software was subject to EAR then it was subject to it regardless of a web page stating it.
[EAR = USA's Export Administration Regulations]
How would a mere downloader from a mirror, or a purchaser of a Centos disk or even a beneficiary of a free Centos disk at a Centos event beware of USA law restrictions and understand the full legal implications of USA law ?
Its reminiscent of the PGP farce from nearly 20? years ago.
With Google slowly removing, or not updating, the open source bits of Android and replacing them by closed sources, will the same commercial strategy emerge from Red Hat into Centos ?
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.