On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:11 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Definitely. But please don't show up ranting about systemd unless you genuinely have something new and insightful to add. We have literally been discussing moving to an improved init system since 2005: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/... and in that decade, pretty much everything to be said _has_ been said and considered. That is, we've *been through* the independent analysis of systemd.
Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than M$-style bloatware which systemd appears to be.
Just what is Fedora's and Red Hat's Plan B when the revolt against systemd escalates ? Whom is going to apologise for fouling-up Red Hat's EL and our beloved Centos ?