On 07/11/2012 07:28 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Natxo Asenjo natxo.asenjo@gmail.com wrote:
Most informed people know how much Oracle has contributed to OSS, but also how it has tried 'monetize' other stuff
Gee, someone could think that they are a for-profit corporation, like IBM (whose DB2 is NOT open source, or Lotus Notes, also NOT open source), yet I don´t see the level of IBM hatred that I routinely see wrt ORCL.
When any corporation puts money into the development of FOSS technologies (like IBM, Oracle, and RedHat has done, I applaud them). Yet, some people always find a need to bash those, as having an evil agenda, namely *god forbid* the PROFIT word...
I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their dealings with foss as opposed to IBM.
But like you say business as usual or "move along, nothing to see here". ;)
FC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos