m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Niki wrote:
JohnS a écrit :
<snip> >> You should have better success with another 128MB of RAM.. <snip> > I corrected that problem, and now it *looks* like everything's OK. But > you're right. Another 128 MB RAM won't hurt. (My first computer, a > single-board 8080, actually had 512 *bytes* of RAM, so it's just a > matter of adapting to modern times :oD)
*heh* I remember the first computer I owned, and my ex and a friend violated the warranty on the RadShack CoCo, opened it up, and doubled the memory for a birthday present. Then, I had 32K ram! (Are you sure you didn't mean 512K RAM?)
Not unless it had some additional hardware assistance. The 8080 can only address 64K.
Apologies - I was thinking 8088. Name doesn't sound at *all* alike.... <g>
mark