On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:12 -0400, Matty wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Alfred von Campe wrote:
Maybe the disk is dying? Did you run smartd (it requires -d ata for SATA disks; this option needs to be put in smartd.conf)?
It's a brand new disk (well, less than three months old), and it pretty much
<snip>
I would also recommend running a long SMART self-test on the drive. If you capture the SMART attributes before and after the test, it is actually pretty easy to locate the source of the problem (e.g., host controller vs disk disk vs. bad sector ) by comparing the SMART attributes that were captured. If you want additional details, check out the following article:
Hmmm. Maybe something I've seen here is related? Regardless, it raises a Q for me.
I'vew a couple commodity IDE ultra drives that have S.M.A.R.T. technology. Diffent sizes, different manufacturers. S.M.A.R.T is disabled in my BIOS. Both drives fail boot after a poer off period. But if I wait for a while after poer on (5 - 10 minutes?), either boots fine. And both have no problem with warm boots.
Symptoms vary from "crc error" after "booting..." message from grub(?) or things just "freeze.
Well, spin up on them shows
FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 0x0007 093 092 021 Pre-fail Always - 1866 0x0027 252 252 063 Pre-fail Always - 1457
Now, the Q is: what do the numbers mean? Seconds? Milliseconds? If it's seconds, the "RAW_VALUE" may explain why all is OK after things have been powered up long enough. If it's ms, I can only thing it is running a self-test. I would have to go read those articles more closely to see what I can determine.
Anyway, I thought the OP might have a similar thing affcting him. Delay in spin-up after sleeping or some other smart-related setting.
Thanks,
- Ryan
-- UNIX Administrator http://prefetch.net _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos