On Jul 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Wyatt andrew@fuduntu.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
William Woods wrote:
Please stop top posting.
On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
William Woods wrote:
On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning centos@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 > my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be > everything which makes > it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - umm.. like Windoze!
> My $.02
- $ 10.00 :-)
Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ?
Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and other unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server vulnerabilities that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, for extra credit, how fast they were admitted, and fixed.....
Like OpenSSL ?
I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows server" exploits
markAre you really trying to win the thread with "but omg windows!"? All software is swiss cheese, the only really secure software is turned off. Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there.
OpenSSL is sadly an excellent example of that.
I was going to bring up OpenSSL but…..yea that.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos