----- Original Message ----- | On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote: | > Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to | > 4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?! | | Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!
Yes, I did notice that, just wondered why. It seems more prone to breakage (creating multiple symlinks vs one)