my fault. I expressed bad what I tried to say.
I understand, there is a Centos version for every RHEL version. Is'nt it?
Fine. And, (at least in theory), in binary every version corresponds to its counterpart.
But, ... maybe I am doing something bad. I'll double check.
I have four CD's corresponding to CentOs 4.0, and browsing the HP site,
I found two posible drivers, one of them specifically for Smart Array
e200i.
I downloaded it and made a diskette with dd= .....
Tried to install CentOs 4.0 with no success.
The same with RHEL 4.0 and everything is ok.
Maybe, ... CentOs is not version 4.0 ... hmm... maybe.
(but ,.... go man, ... double check ...) ..
It's inspiring you have two working machines with CentOs.
I will try again, .. and again.
(Sorry for these days of silence. Here in Guatemala these days are
sacred, ... so. The office is closed. I am taking the rhytm again ... )
Carlos
On 4/3/07, Scott Silva <ssilva@sgvwater.com> wrote:
CARLOS CERRATO spake the following on 4/3/2007 1:29 PM:
> yes. that sounds fine.
>
> I will try it.
>
> by the way. what's the ultimate version of Centos?
>
> I read somewhere that they are going for
5.x?
>
There is no "ultimate" version of CentOS. There is a version corresponding to
each RedHat Enterprise Linux version. There have been Versions 2.1, 3, 4, and
very soon 5, all based on the same RedHat version. The minor numbers
(IE the .4 in 4.4, etc.) correspond to the updated releases that RedHat does
roughly twice a year.
If you are trying to use a driver disk for RedHat, they usually mention which
update set they are for.
I have 2 ML350's but they are the g4p variation. CentOS 4 runs great on them.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos