Hello Phil,
the idea behind of all my private work to get centos 7 work for more as an server only system:
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/
and it looks like a harmless output that can be ignored.
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ X11 and ATI (stable)
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ Mesa (11.1.2 stable)
kernel http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/ 4.4.7 lts stable
the graphical desktop runs much better.
No one of my Desktop PC around works good with the default resources. Don’t forget that centos 7 is from 2014 and two of my machines are from 2010 and 2012.
nux-dextop gstreamer never works for me on Centos 7.2
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/
this setup run everything that i touch in multimedia with totem.
Sources and rpm not gpg - private server.
Baken with Centos and epel mock
Sincerely
Andy
Am 16.04.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Phil Wyett philwyett@irregulars-engineering.com:
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote:
Hello guys...
I compiled inside of "mock"
libdrm 2.67 mesa 11.2.1 ati 7.6.1
mockbuild says:
libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
installed packaged:
xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos @local-drivers OK
libdrm.x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
glxinfo says:
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM 3.6.2) OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30 OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2 OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.00
DRM 2.43.0 ??
Wired...
These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of these SRPMs?
Regards
Phil