Craig White wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury mark.bradbury@gmail.com wrote:
Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?
And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would take no more than 1 month ?
Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
Why? seems like a valid point to me.
But at that time there should only be one point release on the table, instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time?
I think you are confusing overlap with simultaneous.
• 2011-02-16: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9 • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6 • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month before 4.9
Hardly qualifies at the same time unless you consider 3 months to be essentially the same time.
But you need to also calculate time elapsed between date of Distribution Release and date of release of SRPMS for 6.0. Am I correct that it took a month for SRPMS to be released?
Ljubomir