On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:36 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. > If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and > see what it's doing? > Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not > executable, which should be easy to fix. > > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > >> All.... >> >> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker >> staff have been helpful but no cigar. >> >> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine >> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received >> the same error. >> >> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called >> eula which fails. >> >> ./eula: cannot execute binary file >> >> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use >> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. >> >> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be >> listening to this list and could give me a hand. >> >> Thanks much!!! >> >> Greg Ennis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and received the same error :
[root@MailIn install]# ./eula -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable : -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T
Thanks for your help!!
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, What information is returned when you type file eula ?
typing in ./eula returns -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system different than EL5 Linux.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on one of my systems if I type
file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Clint,
Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification
Here is the result. eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped
Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?
Greg _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi, Definitely.
I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely AIX or PowerPC.
Tkae Care
Thanks for your help !!!!! I'll give Esker the information !!!