Hello!<br><br>You can look at xfs: <a href="http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/">http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/</a><br>I think this benchmarks help you: <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=ext4_benchmarks&amp;num=2">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=ext4_benchmarks&amp;num=2</a><br>
<span dir="ltr" id=":1i">I use this file system for MySQL with a big DB on Software RAID. This file system shows good perfomance for small files.</span><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/3 Roland RoLaNd <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:r_o_l_a_n_d@hotmail.com">r_o_l_a_n_d@hotmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">



<div>
Dear all,<br><br>i&#39;m setting up a new machine to handle a webserver with mysql<br><br>web directory contains alot of small files and database is around 15 GB<br><br>i&#39;ve did a bit research, read alot of articles..<br>
mainly i came up with the understanding that:<br><br>EXT3 is the set it and forget it kind of filesystem.<br>and reiserFS is the best choice for small files though there&#39;s a bigger risk of data loss upon power failure (better solved in ext3)<br>
<br>any advice on this matter? or any other filesystem you advise me to use on a production system?<br><br>thanks<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> 		 	   		  </div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best regards,<br><br>Eugene Kilimchuk &lt;<a href="mailto:ekilimchuk@gmail.com">ekilimchuk@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>