On 04/15/2011 04:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/14/2011 06:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:
On 4/14/2011 6:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Is it really true that the time is working perfectly with one of the other kernels (the older ones)?
Johnny,
Yes, As long as I run the older 5.5 kernel my time is perfect. All
clients can get from this machine with no issues. As soon as I run new kernel, or Plus kernel for that matter. The time goes downhill. "Uphill actually"
To answer the previous question I do have the HW clock set to utc,
Everything is stock from initial install of the package.
Brian.
I do not see anything from Dell that is a model C151.
I also do not see anything in the RH bugzilla that is problematic for older AMD processors and the clock, unless running KVM type virtual machines.
Is this a VM or regular install?
If this a real machine, do you have the latest BIOS from Dell?
Do you have any special kernel options in grub?
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It also occured to me to ask if this was running in a VM, but it sounded like it was running on actual hardware. I once had a vmware VM in which I had similar misbehavior of the clock. Eventually I discovered that the following simple program when run inside the VM would return immediately instead of delaying for 10 seconds as it should.
#include <stdio.h> /* #include <sys/select.h> */ #include <sys/time.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h>
int main() { fd_set set; struct timeval timeout; int filedes = STDIN_FILENO;
FD_ZERO (&set); FD_SET (filedes, &set);
timeout.tv_sec = 10; timeout.tv_usec = 0;
select(FD_SETSIZE, &set, NULL, NULL, &timeout);
}
I then found out that the ISP had set the host OS for my VM to Ubuntu when I was running CentOS 5 in the VM. The cause was that VMware assumed a tickless kernel for Ubuntu, but not for CentOS 5 and there were optimizations in the VM emulation that counted on VMware knowing what timekeeping options where set in the kernel.
Nataraj