Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

On 01/10/2012 11:20 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwalsh@redhat.com wrote:

...

On 01/10/2012 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:

...

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwalsh@redhat.com wrote:

...

Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance the products. :^)

Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?

I don't understand the question.

Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?

I was talking Money not vendor specific. The question meant as a jab was if more people used RHEL instead of Centos, we could pay more developers. I thought the @redhat.com would signify why I would want that. :^)