18 Aug
2006
18 Aug
'06
8:55 p.m.
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 16:32 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
Philip Wyett wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:38 -0400, Alain Reguera wrote:
Hello,
I've been talking with some friends about the Redhat's SRPMs release issue. I've been reading the trademarks and some points of GPL. But get some confusion around the questions:
Is redhat forced to release the sources of its product?
RedHat choose to use and release GPL code and a requirement of that is the making available of the source code.
Two things:
- Point me to the clause in the GPL that says you have to give the source
away to someone you didn't give binaries to.
Saying the "releasing GPL code" implied customers. Maybe I should have been a little more specific.
- There is a bunch of software in RHEL that isn't GPL.
I never brought non GPL into this.
Regards
Phil