On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 08:07:22PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:36:29PM +1300, Peter wrote:
On 12/06/2013 01:24 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
Guys/Gals:
On 64bit 6.5, I've had to "yum remove" the Xiphos package because it was causing errors in "yum update", complaints about it requiring libgtkhtml-editor.
It's in the gtkhtml3 package.
# yum whatprovides */libgtkhtml-editor.so.0 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.advancedhosters.com * elrepo: elrepo.org * epel: mirrors.mit.edu * extras: mirror.steadfast.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.nexcess.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.nexcess.net * updates: mirror.cisp.com 87 packages excluded due to repository priority protections No Matches found
Should I be worried about the 87 packages excluded by priority protections?
No, that doesn't seem to be the problem.
further digging:
# locate gtkhtml-editor <snip> /usr/lib64/libgtkhtml-editor.so /usr/lib64/libgtkhtml-editor.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgtkhtml-editor.so.0.0.0 <snip>
# yum list installed | grep -y gtkhtml gtkhtml3.x86_64 3.32.2-2.el6 @base gtkhtml3-devel.x86_64 3.32.2-2.el6 @base
# rpm -ql gtkhtml3.x86_64 | grep libgtkhtml-editor /usr/lib64/libgtkhtml-editor-3.14.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgtkhtml-editor-3.14.so.0.0.0
So the file is there, and it came from a RPM file properly installed from the Centos "base" repo.
so, why won't yum divulge that RPM as the source of the .so file when I do: yum whatprovides */libgtkhtml-editor.so.0 ?????