On 2/16/2011 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
If we could hire 3 or 4 people (and provide any kind of reasonable job security for their future), that might be an option. Otherwise I think injecting a limited amount of cash into the process just produces hurt feelings and degrades, not improves, the process.
That is just one thought ...
Job security - what's that?
Maybe you could pay someone to post the status updates that apparently no one else wants to do - and deflect the criticism when the time estimates are wrong.