3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
2:31 p.m.
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200:
Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com