Hi,
Thank you for your help. I had rebuild the HylaFAX as you had suggested without any problem and running fine so far.
--- Alexander Dalloz ad+lists@uni-x.org wrote:
Am Mi, den 15.03.2006 schrieb Chin um 2:23:
Hi all,
Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm
rather
than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried
to
install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64. Thank you.
Regards, Chin
Generally you can run i386 software on x86_64 arch of CentOS. If you opt for the x86_64 only alternate, then I wouldn't choose the FC3 RPM of HylaFax as FC3 isn't identical with RHEL4, just a base for it's development. I would take the SRC.RPM
ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/binary/linux/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm
and "rpmbuild --rebuild --target x86_64 hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm" it.
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 22:00:58 up 4 days, 23:48, load average: 0.50, 0.48, 0.43
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos. http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/