On 12/05/2014 01:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote:
Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . .
Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the following?
grep avc /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow
#============= amavis_t ============== allow amavis_t shell_exec_t:file execute; allow amavis_t sysfs_t:dir search;
#============= clamscan_t ============== allow clamscan_t amavis_spool_t:dir read;
In the latest rhel6 policies amavas_t and clamscan_t have been merged into antivirus_t? Is you selinux-policy up 2 date?
Yes, everything is up-to-date as of the time of report and I have checked again this morning. That system has no unapplied fixes for software provided through the official CentOS-6 repositories. Does this change apply only to 7 or has it been backported? Both amavisd-new and clamav are provided via the epel repository.
rpm -q selinux-policy
selinux-policy-3.7.19-260.el6 is the current policy in development.
#============= logwatch_mail_t ============== allow logwatch_mail_t usr_t:lnk_file read;
#============= postfix_master_t ============== allow postfix_master_t tmp_t:dir read;
#============= postfix_postdrop_t ============== allow postfix_postdrop_t tmp_t:dir read;
#============= postfix_showq_t ============== allow postfix_showq_t tmp_t:dir read;
Any reason postfix would be listing the contents of /tmp or /var/tmp? Did you put some content into these directories that have something to do with mail?
That question I need put to the Postfix mailing list. I see nothing in the spec file that bears on the matter and the tarball was pulled from:
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/official/
#============= postfix_smtp_t ============== allow postfix_smtp_t postfix_spool_maildrop_t:file { read write getattr };