Absolutely. The solution seems really robust and the price is not bad.
In my case, however, this is not the answer as I need a solution that can be implemented in a whole variety of networks, including virtual ones.
Thanks anyways.
Boris.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Joseph Spenner joseph85750@yahoo.comwrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepstein@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations
Joseph,
Thanks!
Did you mean this:
https://www.barracudanetworks.com/products/loadbalancer
But this looks like an integrated solution, hardware and software. I am just looking for the software part.
Boris.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joseph Spenner <joseph85750@yahoo.com
wrote:
I've had pretty good luck with Barracuda load balancers.. You can configure them to keep a user session on a single server, which is often desired, and spread new connections to other servers as they arrive. The only problem I had with them, ironically, was they would crash if I purchased their "Live Updates" feature. It's some sort of auto updating black-list service you can buy which helps protect the device and your resources. But after I disabled that, the device has been rock solid. Been working great since about 2006.
Yes. It might be worth just getting the whole canned solution, though. It is Linux based. At the time, the thing was about $1800, which isn't really that bad, and it just works. There's a web interface to configure it, and it's relatively intuitive.
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons. "~heart~ Sticker" fixer: http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos