I have used WB a little too. The reason I moved over was the availability of support. I get answers to problems faster with CentOS on lists and irc. WB was good, but answers where really slow, and sometime I never got answers at all.
Cheers.
--- M�rio Gamito gamito@netual.pt wrote:
Hi,
For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like.
Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves.
That's why i'm writing to you, posing a few questions, if you don't mind to answer:
1 - Why did you choose CentOS ?
2 - If you have/had experience with WBEL, why do you prefer CentOS ?
3 - Is CentOS ahead of WBEL in terms of being up to date with RHEL ?
4 - Does CentOS releases an updated version everytime RH does ?
5 - What is (more or less) the time gap between a RHEL update and the correspondent CentOS ?
I apologise for the inconvinience and any help would be apreceiated.
Warm regards, M�rio Gamito -- http://www.startux.org/~gamito _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@caosity.org http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com