On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@SoftDux.com> wrote:



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office@plnet.rs> wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>>> Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...
>>> openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella.  They aren't going to
>>> use anything else.
>> Eh? I was under the impression that they are separate and that Garrett
>> Damore was rather unhappy with the initial direction of OpenIndiana in
>> not preparing for an illumos release. 148 is still not illumos as far as
>> I know.
>
> afaik, both are still using pretty much the last opensolaris kernel with
> minor changes
>
>
> I was going on this, which says OpenIndiana is a member of the Illumos
> Foundation, that Illumos was providing the core/kernel, and OpenIndiana
> is integrating it into a complete system aka distribution
> http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F
>
> They go onto say they are waiting for Illumos to mature before they
> integrate it.

Eham..., CentOS mailinglist.... maybe to continue in private?

Ljubomir


Eham....., many people are learning a lot more from this thread than a lot of the other threads in the past few days. let them continue, and don't subscribe to the tread :)

I agree with both assessments, but since this is a CentOS list and this thread has now twisted into ZFS advocacy I must say as well, continue off list.

-Ross