24 Oct
2016
24 Oct
'16
11:40 p.m.
On 10/24/2016 07:29 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
As I noted in my original repost, that it needs to be on a UPS
Ah. I see that now. Still, may I suggest that whenever we recommend remedies that eliminate reliability measures, such as mounting with "nobarrier", we also repeat caveats so that users who find these conversations in search results later don't miss them? I think that's important to note that the system should be on a UPS, *and* that it has been verified that the system will perform an orderly shut-down before the UPS loses charge. "nobarrier" shouldn't be used without performing such a test.