On 07/08/2014 12:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/08/2014 12:44 PM, Hal Wigoda wrote:
You aren't old.
And I am a young 21. three times over. All that means is I have to learn new stuff now 3 times to get it right! As some people on this list will attest to :)
Soon I will be 26 (2^6). So that means that I have to then learn everything 6 times!
Hmm... well soon I will be 26 + 4.
Age is what you make of it. Senior moments are to be cherished. ;)'
(Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors.)
On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Russell Miller duskglow@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de wrote:
That presumes that your conservative attitude is the majority opinion though. Systemd is one of the features that I have been looking forward to in CentOS 7 because of the new capabilities it provides so while this will surely drive some people away it will actually attract others and if you think that this will lead to some sort of great exodus then I think you are mistaken. Not everybody is this uncomfortable with change.
For the record, I'm not uncomfortable with change. I'm uncomfortable with stupid, poorly thought out, monolithic change that ignores half a century of the UNIX philosophy. And creating a daemon that tries to handle everything but the kitchen sink and implementing it in such a way as to make it nearly incomprehensible to me certainly qualifies as that type of change.
Sysvinit may not be perfect, but it's UNIX. Systemd is... a lot of things, but more of a windows-like solution than I"m comfortable with. It's just dumb. Surely there could have been a better way of accomplishing their goals without creating the equivalent of Cartman's Trapper Keeper.