Just my opinion but rpmforge was great for CentOS 5 then epel was better for 6.....I haven't tested 7 enough to know yet.
Adam King IT Systems Administrator Skipton Girls High School 01756 707600 www.sghs.org.uk
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" matt.mailinglists@gmail.com To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, 14 August, 2014 5:08:33 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Instaling LAMP on CentOS 7.x
So EPEL is preferred over rpmforge now days? In past to get clamav and some other packages seemed like I had to use rpmforge.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Always Learning centos@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 11:26 -0400, John Plemons wrote:
Here is a link to enable the epel repo
http://www.tecmint.com/how-to-enable-epel-repository-for-rhel-centos-6-5/ ( It was updated to include CentOS 7 )
This is probably a better link as it provides more choices, for example
- EPEL 7 beta: x86_64, ppc64, sources
- EPEL 6: i386, x86_64, ppc64, sources
- EPEL 5: i386, x86_64, ppc, sources
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
-- Regards,
Paul. England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos