Or another way of putting it: nothing makes files disappear faster than fat.
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
-----Original Message----- From: gjgowey@tmo.blackberry.net
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:37:34 To:"CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Silly question - Anything faster than rm?
For deleting performance. When it comes to deleting files, fat seems fairly quick.
Geoff
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:14:48 To:CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Silly question - Anything faster than rm?
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:14:54PM +0000, gjgowey@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
Go with fat16 or fat32 instead of ext3fs.
For performance???
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org http://mattdm.org/ Boston University Linux ------> http://linux.bu.edu/ _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos