On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 22:05 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Karl S. Katzke wrote:
First of all, I just want to say *again* how happy I am with CentOS.
Across our boxes and our clients boxes, we're running it on more than
20 machines at the moment and it's by far the most painless OS to
administer in detail that I've ever used. (Of course, I'm an old Slak
hat, but ...) Thanks so much to the community and the maintainers.
We've recently run into a problem with a dual-opteron system that is
running LTSP and serving up X and Firefox to a whole bunch of diskless
clients. We're using the x86-64 build of CentOS, with the appropriate
Firefox package. The client users have all been asking for Flash,
since many websites are unusable without Flash these days ... but
there's no 64-bit build of the Flash plugin. (Thanks, Macromedia! You
suck!)
What's the best way to provide Flash (and maybe Java?) with Firefox on
this server box? How big will the performance hit be from running
non-64 bit packages? Any specific tips & hints?
Thanks!
-Karl Katzke
_______________________________________________
You could run the 32-bit Firefox & 32-bit plugins, they are *supposed*
to work seamlessly under the x86_64 OS. YMMV & all that. I have seen
much talk about this on the SuSE AMD64 list, and this recommendation has
floated out more than once.
Right ... the only option would be to remove the x86_64 firefox and
install the i386 one ... but that might require MANY other i386
libraries. (I can't test it here).
Tell them to get over it is another option :)
Should not be a huge performance issue ... at least I haven't noticed
any earth shattering performance enhancements between the x86_64 and
i386 distros when installed on x86_64 machines (that one could feel via
the GUI screen).
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos