On Tue, December 30, 2014 03:18, Digimer wrote:
What possible reason could they have for that?
On 30/12/14 02:17 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
By any change, is it a VPS? I know that my CloudAtCost (very cheap but extremely unreliable provider) prevents you from using SeLinux on their Centos image.
No mysterious breakages == lower support costs. The same reason MicroSoft shipped everything on and open for years and thereby built up the malware industry from scratch.