On 01/31/2013 09:26 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
As you have seen there are differences between the packages. This makes the CentOS documentation worthless to you as you are not using the same versions used in the documentation.
I had hopes that the 'official' packaging would work well, particularly now that both are on the same release. I really wanted to do this all 'official' packages. I know there is nothing wrong with rpmforge, I use it for a number of things, just this time around for mail, I was shooting for 'fully supported cruft'. Shows how good that approach takes!
I'm not sure what made you think so,
Oh, I don't know. Maybe that it is run under the Fedora/Redhat umbrella as a recognized SIG? :)
but epel is no more "official" than rpmforge. It's just another third party repo. The only "official" repos are base and updates. Perhaps CR could qualify as semi-official... and that's it, I'ld say.
glad Ned could help you solve your problem.
I have submitted a bug report on this: 906396