Dear All,
thanks for the responses.
Indeed, on machine A, Selinux is disabled.
-bash-4.1# selinuxenabled && echo enabled || echo disabled disabled
and on machine B, it's enabled.
I will test the script again on B with Selinux disabled.
Greetings, J.
Op 24-04-13 18:06, Ian Forde schreef:
Yep - you'll want to do a 'ls -lZ' on both dirs and compare the differences... On Apr 24, 2013 8:32 AM, "Larry Martell" larry.martell@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Johan Vermeulen jvermeulen@cawdekempen.be wrote:
Dear All,
I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
I see a difference in machine A :
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-netreport -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 335 okt 22 2012 04-iscsi -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 345 jan 9 12:13 05-netfs -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 926 sep 25 2012 10-dhclient -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 301 apr 24 15:58 20-backuplauncher -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 220 jun 22 2012 yum-NetworkManager-dispatcher
and machine B:
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:34 . drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 apr 23 12:06 .. -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-netreport -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 345 jan 9 12:13 05-netfs -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 926 sep 25 2012 10-dhclient -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 326 apr 23 13:42 15-nfslauncher -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 307 apr 24 16:10 20-backuplauncher -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 220 jun 22 2012 yum-NetworkManager-dispatcher
the difference being -rwxr-xr-x and -rwxr-xr-x.
so with or without a dot (.)
Does that mean anything?
Thanks for any advise on this.
The . means the file has an access list with SELinux. You could try disabling SELinux on machine B and seeing if that fixes the issue. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos