On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Santi Saez santisaez@woop.es wrote:
El 03/01/2011 20:15, Akemi Yagi escribió:
You may want to look into the srpms of nx/freenx in the CentOS extras repository. The spec file contains the following:
# centos_ver is a number (2,3,4,5). It can be provided in the build system or # via the command line with the following define for rpmbuild # --define "centos_ver 5" # If centos_ver is not provided the following will find it and should work on # all current redhat based EL rebuilds, will not work properly on FC though
%{!?centos_ver: %define centos_ver %(Z=`rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/redhat-release`;A=`rpm -q --qf '%{V}' $Z`; echo ${A:0:1})}
Hi Akemi,
Thanks for the tip :)
If I put Johnny's code in my .rpmmacros it works, but I get this warning:
error: Macro % has illegal name (%define)
I have solved with this change:
# Helper variable that defines CentOS release number, http://goo.gl/dkGUg # This macro is based on Johnny Hughes's freenx.spec, from "extras" repo %rhel %(/bin/rpm -q --qf '%{VERSION}' centos-release)
Hmmm.. You might befit from the portability of this approach
%rhel 0%(/bin/rpm -q --f /etc/redhat-release -qf '%{VERSION}\n' )
Notice that this now works with RHEL and CentOS, and the "\n" keeps certain programs historically happier with the commands having an EOL.