Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:00:48 +0100:
I wonder now if the owner of that directory should actually be named?
Hm, after looking on other machines that have named installed but not in use it's excactly the same there. So, if named wants write permission there, but the rpm always removes that permission - isn't the rpm wrong then? Should I report this as a bug?
On my system, named does not have write permission to the named directory, but it does have permission to named/data.
# ll /var/named/chroot/var/ total 24 drwxr-x--- 4 root named 4096 Aug 25 2004 named drwxrwx--- 3 root named 4096 Mar 13 2003 run drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 Mar 13 2003 tmp
# ll /var/named/chroot/var/named/ total 16 drwxrwx--- 5 named named 4096 Sep 25 14:25 data drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 Jul 27 2004 slaves
Everything is working fine for me with these settings, so I don't think this is a problem.