Gordon, thanks!
What sort of security implications did you have in mind? Just curious.
Boris.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Gordon Messmer gordon.messmer@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/25/2015 04:20 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets.
That's not a mistake, per se. Having vlan 48 as the native vlan just means that you'd want 192.168.48.100 on eth0 instead of eth0.48.
For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works.
As long as you aren't concerned about the security implications of that host having access to vlan 1, that seems pretty reasonable. The system will get some extra broadcast traffic, but the ethernet card will probably filter those out so that they don't have to be processed.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos