I thought the were default configuration differences between RHEL and CentOS such that in theory it was &quot;more secure&quot; out of the box.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:56 PM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:centos@911networks.com">centos@911networks.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:48:53 -0500<br>
&quot;Michael Schenck&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:limeschenck@gmail.com">limeschenck@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; CentOS is a &quot;more secure&quot; RHEL, I&#39;m not at all sure where you got<br>
&gt; &quot;better HW support&quot;...<br>
<br>
</div>CentOS is identical to RHEL, except for the copyrights, licensing and<br>
logos. The keyword is identical.<br>
<br>
Why is it more secure? Why would CentOS have better HW support?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Thanks<br>
<a href="http://www.911networks.com" target="_blank">http://www.911networks.com</a><br>
When the network has to work<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>