23 Mar
2008
23 Mar
'08
1:57 p.m.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:46 +0100, Daniel de Kok wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not talking about the spec file metadata, I'm talking about the signature that's applied to the package itself.
A signature is just a special digest of the contents. I don't see how that could be licensed differently.
And a painting of a landscape is just a special digest (or interpretation, if you prefer) of a landscape. It falls under copyright law, regardless of what laws the canvas or paint are required to follow.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet@gmail.com
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed