On 4 Feb 2016 03:10, "Always Learning" centos@u64.u22.net wrote:
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 13:57 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ricardo J. Barberis ricardo@palmtx.com.ar
wrote:
El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió:
Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links.
I guess that's probably to execute scripts and "hide" the name of the interpreter, e.g.:
I get why second-rate programmers would care to do that, but what I
don’t get is why systemd would need a feature to support that wish.
Perhaps the Systemd are all 'second-rate' programmers ? Good programmers always try to avoid the crap.
That's enough.
You've been around these lists long enough to realise attacks like that nonsense are inappropriate and won't be tolerated.