On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: 
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com> wrote:

On 04/07/2011 01:18 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:


      

        
I had a quick look at the patches. The first one seems to be
applicable without any modifications. The second one will need an
adjustment.


      

      

      

        
Akemi

I just finished building a kernel based on
kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.src.rpm. I hand applied the patches. Like you said
one applied clean the other applied with a fuzz offset of -36 (IIRC). I am
installing now to test.

My rebuild was simply cp the /boot/config-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.i686 to
.config;make oldconfig;make rpm

That is why I was asking about the proper way.

I have just installed the kernel and will now start testing.


      

      
Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they
will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel.




    

    I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes
    in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased  to report

    that they appear to work as advertised. With:

    net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2

    net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2

    

    Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were
    accepted and I could still forward packets.

    

    I didn't make new patches, I simply did

    %define with_fuzzy_patches 1

    

    Also what should the normal rpmbuild line be?

    I ended up doing

    rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec --with firmware
    --without debug --without debuginfo

    

    The first time I didn't have --with firmware and the kernel wouldn't
    install.

    

    Regards,

    

    
-- 

      Stephen Clark

      NetWolves

      Sr. Software Engineer III

      Phone: 813-579-3200

      Fax: 813-882-0209

      Email: steve.clark@netwolves.com

      http://www.netwolves.com