6 Nov
2014
6 Nov
'14
10:11 p.m.
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official "supplementary" ones from RH?
In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment, etc... ?
Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not.
I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because they do distribute the pepperflash component.
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.