12 Feb
2017
12 Feb
'17
9:15 p.m.
On 02/12/2017 10:56 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It's probably safe to specify some range of higher numbered ports:
use-v4-udp-ports { range 10240 65535; }; use-v6-udp-ports { range 10240 65535; };
But that is not the ports that I am seeing in logwatch:
Yes, I know. The work-around in the bug report specifies which ports to exclude, but it doesn't include some of the ports you saw in your logs, so it won't solve the problem entirely. If you instead specify the ports that are allowed, and use a higher range of ports, the work-around should be more reliable.