On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dag Wieers dag@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers dag@centos.org wrote:
Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit.
And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from RPMforge as soon as Dag has a chance to push them... :-D
Thanks to Ned for providing them.
Yes, they will be available in RPM format by tomorrow.
Back to our regular programme...
Thanks Dag - you're a star!
A dying star ;-)
Anyway, looking at the SPEC files I noticed for iwl3945 and iwl4956 firmware not the latest version have been used. Is there a good reason for it or just an oversight ?
Let me explain :-)
When I tested the -2 version of the iwl3945 firmware, it did not work for me and I had to go back to the -1.
If there is a reason we should state so in the SPEC file so people retain that information.
PS Are you sure you don't want RPMforge commit access ?
I'm sure Ned would love to have the access. :D
Akemi