On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Greg Lindahl lindahl@pbm.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl lindahl@pbm.com:
I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me.
CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is?
I mean, I'm used to the concept that CentOS used to say the current version is 6.3 when RHEL 6.4 was released but hadn't made it through the CentOS pipeline.
But how am I supposed to figure out that CentOS 7.1503 < 7.2 ?
I suppose I should blame myself for not being a bigger ass that CentOS didn't adopt my proposal of saying Centos 7.1.1503 vs 7.2.1511. But really, does ANYONE think the current scheme is clear?
Anyone?
Bueller?
Am I the only ass about this problem? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
You are not the only ass about the problem.
I have complained bitterly about this, apparently to deaf ears.
I dislike this version numbering scheme hugely. The implications to CentOS not being the same "version" as RHEL is *much* more than just a different number to those who don't know differently. And those are the people who make this difference a huge amount of extra work for us.
There's NO reason for this that makes any sense. None.