Hi guys,
Could you be so kind to trim those quotes a little?
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:40 -0400, Cal Webster wrote:
Both builds work without problems on single and dual-head systems here. As with all the other tests, I only replaced the tigervnc-server-module package on each host.
Something in the bug report struck me as odd: The original report is from May 9th. Checking Red Hat's FTP I see there is a more recent SRPM than the one you are discussing.
ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/tigervnc-1.0.90-0.15.20110314svn4359.el6_1.1.src.rpm
Seems like this update wasn't picked up even though it's two months old, and the previous (current) one was rebuilt three months after it was released by upstream.
Regards, Leonard.