On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 01:48, Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to centos other than it's differences from upstream., most of which aren't technical.
Might I suggest to investigate Scientific Linux as well?
SL is also RHEL-based, but I do believe that some other packages are added. SL has had a 6.0 release, as well as 4.9. I don't know about 5.6, though.